| Resolution GBR-1998-5-8 |
| Title Procedural requirements for GB resolution |
| Content Title: Procedural requirements for GB resolutions and other affairs Section I. GB resolutions Initiations and adoptions of GB resolutions shall satisfy the requirements stipulated in the bylaw. Further, 1. All proposals or drafts of GB resolutinos shall have a resolution number in the form of "GBR year-month-n", where "n" is a sequentially ordered number. 2. Sponsor(s) shall make an effort to use a valid number, or request such from the secretary. 3. The secretary is responsible for the book-keeping of the resolution numbers and ensuring all proposals have the correct resolution number. 4. The resolution number must appear in the "Subject" line of the E-mail containing the proposal, preferably followed by a short title. 5. After sufficient discussion and debate, the sponsor(s) may send the secretary a request for vote. Upon receiving the request, the secretary shall conduct a vote if other procedural requirements are satisfied. 6. All resolutions must be voted upon unless withdrawn. Votes can be "for", "against", or "abstain". All votes shall be counted for the purpose of forming a quorum. No-vote shall not be counted for the quorum and no default shall be assumed or considered. 7. Voting results shall be recorded and archived along with the resolution, either passed or rejected. Section II. GB Communications and other affairs The following GB affairs are considered non resolution matters: 1. Communications and exchanges representing the Foundation and/or the GB. 2. Routine work assignments. 3. Any other business that do not have a binding effect on AF and/or GB's operations. The initiation and adoption of GB communications and other affairs must be consistant with the bylaw. Further, 1. All drafts or proposals shall have a GB affairs number in the form of "GBA year-month-n" where "n" is a sequentially ordered number. 2. Any GB member can submit a draft or proposal to the GB for debate and vote. 3. If no objections is raised in 72 hours after submission, the draft or proposal is agreed to by default. 4. Any board member can send the secretary a request for vote for any such matter. The secretary shall conduct a vote after receiving the request if other procedural requirements are satisfied. In such event, the "default passing rule" shall not apply. 5. All such drafts or proposals shall be archived, either agreed or rejected. |
| Add'l info |
| Author Zhang, Huayi |
| Sponsors Dongzi, Xun, Jianfeng |
| Last Change 2002-03-21 |
About Us
| Resolution GBR-1999-11-1 |
| Title USTCAF Fund Investment Guidelines |
| Content Purpose This document specifies the guideline for how USTCAF fund should be invested. Detail * The basic principle is to have a 50/50 split of stock market, and short term cash. * At 15 days past the start of each quarter, no more than 60%, and no less than 40%, of the total AF fund should be invested in a stock market index fund, preference is given to ones ones tracking S&P500. * At 15 days past the start of each quarter, No more than 60%, and no less than 40%, of the total AF fund should be invested in a money market fund, or similar cash-equivalent instrument. * The AF portfolio is to be evaluated at the end of each quarter. Investment adjustment is only made during the first 15 days of each quarter. * We have chosen to consolidate all of our bank and CD account, and move everything to the brokerage account we have with Schwab. |
| Add'l info |
| Author Li, Steven |
| Sponsors Liu Dongzi, Li Xiaojun |
| Last Change 2002-03-21 |
| Resolution GBR-2000-3-2 |
| Title Guideline For Selling Donated Stocks |
| Content This document serves as the guideline for the USTC Alumni Foundation (USTCAF) to dispose of stock shares donated by members. The USTC AF designates the current treasurer to execute the process outlined below. All stock shares received by the USTCAF go through a three-step process, getting ready to be sold, sell at a desired price set by the donor, then the final selling. Step 1. Stock shares become ready for sale when all of the following conditions are met: (a) The stock shares have been transfered to the USTCAF acccount. (b) The estimated commission is no more than 10% of the stock value. Step 2. After a stock become ready for sale, AND if the donor had NOT specified a desired price for the stock to be sold, SKIP this step. (a) A limit order will be used to sell the stock. (b) The price on the order will be the same price specified by the donor (c) The order is entered on the first day the stock becomes ready to sell. (d) The order is cancelled if it is not executed within 5 business days, or until the end of a Tuesday, whichever is LATER. Step 3. The stock is then sold with the following method: (a) A limit order will be used to sell the stock. (b) The order is entered on the first Tuesday night, after market close. (d) If the order is not executed, the limit of the order is revised daily after the close of market, using the closing price of that day, until the order is executed. |
| Add'l info |
| Author Li, Xun |
| Sponsors LIU Dongzi, LI Xiaolin |
| Last Change 2002-03-21 |
| Resolution GBR-1999-2-1 |
| Title 1999 Chair Election Procedure |
| Content Background: 1. According to USTCAF Bylaw Article III "The USTCAF shall have a three-member executive committee (EC), consisting of a chairperson, a vice-chair, and a secretary." "The Chairperson, Vice-chair, and directors of subcommittees are appointed by the Governing Board, and they are usually directors of the Governing Board." However, the Chair election procedure is never clearly defined. 2. Past experience in electing Chair: In 1996, each GB members submitted 3 names with prefered order(points) and then the one with highest points became Chair. In 1997 and 1998, one GB member was nominated and strongly favored, even though we also used the point system, the Chair was almost already decided at the moment the candidate was nominated because of lack of competition. 3. Why change now? * No one expressed strong interest to run for the Chair at this moment due to various reasons, so no candidate to be nominated. * To make the Chair election process fair and open, give every GB member a chance. * To avoid "forcing" someone "popular" but "too busy" to become Chair. Proposed procedure: First Step: Elect a three-member executive committee -- all GB members except those who declined in advance are candidates. Each GB member should send three names with prefered order to a neutral monitor ZHANG Shangyou(771) at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Second Step: After the three-member executive committee is elected, the three members have to discuss among themselves who should be the Chair, and who should be appointed Vice Chair, Secretary. Third Step: GB make a final confirmation vote on the Chair, Vice Chair and Secretary. The Chair can appoint other officials such as Treasurer, Directors of Subcommittees etc. who can also attend meetings of executive committee. Pro and Cons: 1. To ensure that every GB member gets a fair chance to be in the executive committee; 2. Flexible, since the Chair only needs to be a good coordinator, so it is not necessary for the most "popular" person to become the Chair. Being in the 3-member EC already garuanteed the support of GB. 3. The only drawback is that GB members have to be careful in choosing the three members, since anyone could become Chair. |
| Add'l info |
| Author Liu, Dongzi |
| Sponsors Xiaoou Tang, Zheng Liu |
| Last Change 2002-03-21 |
|
Resolution |
|
Title |
|
Content Guidelines for the USTCAF High School Scholarship
(Note: AF is a shorthand name for USTC Alumni Foundation (USTCAF); 1. THE GOAL: To attract the best high school graduates to attend USTC. 2. The HSS Awards -- ONS and ENS. The HSS will provide additional funds for ONS and serve as a The HSS award annually ENS with a cash amount of $300 or more, (1) from the specific high school where the HSS is available, The assessment on academic standing might vary from year to year. 3. The HSS Fund Management. HSS for several high schools may combine to issue ENS awards. 4. Responsibilities of USTC. 5. GB is the sole decision maker on all issues related to HSS. AF is not liable for any dispute due to failure of USTC to 6. Status of awardees. The recipient of AF's awards should bear high moral and merit 7. Bill of conflicts. Copyrigh(C) 2002 USTCAF, All Rights Reserved. 中国科大校友基金会高中奖学金评选规则 [高中奖学金评选规则中文版和英文版如有抵触,以英文版本为准。] 说明
1目标 2与ONS、ENS的关系 高中奖学金每年提供不少于300美元的资金,具体金额根据捐款数目确定。 ENS 基金会理事会建议采用以下方式:
3 高中奖学金基金管理 4 科大义务
5 基金会理事会拥有高中奖学金所有相关事务的唯一决定权。校友基金会理事会不对任何由 6 获奖人条件:校友基金会奖学金获得者应是品质优良。 7 抵触条款:校友基金会保留本规则的最终解释权。理事会就获奖事宜做出的决定是最终的。 2002年 中国科大校友基金会 版权所有,侵权必究 |
|
Add'l info |
|
Author |
|
Sponsors |
|
Last Change |
History
History category description
Resolutions
Those are all current in effect resolutions
Introduction
Introduction category description